I checked out a certain website last year, but I guess that I was dealing with some scrupulosity and / or with some anxiety over it, and I decided that I didn't really want to be associated with the website, itself.
I had been talking to someone on there (and it was nothing inappropriate, of course!), and I guess that I psyched myself out about the whole situation (like ... being a part of that website and / or talking about that stuff, I guess), and I ended up acting like it wasn't me (but I did try to confess it up ... so, hopefully, they saw / read that stuff ... so ... I'm sorry about that whole situation, Dude!).
After that, I ended up re-making an account twice (because I had already deleted mine). One of those times was because I guess that I was worried that they might mention that in the chatroom, and the other one of those times was to try to send them a message to clarify the whole situation to them. (But I guess that I couldn't do either one of those things.)
I do remember a little bit of negativity going on in the chatroom (but that was at a different time, and that was over some other things). As for NSFW posts, I basically just remember one post that seemed to be kind of NSFW. But ... anyway(s) ... moving on!
I also didn't really have a good experience of interacting with the owner of the website.
- They refused to delete my information / my posts off of the website [because they weren't personally identifying enough to be deleted?]. (Urgh! I kind of feel like your information / your posts should be able to be deleted if you ask about it in most cases.)
- They technichally "cyber-stalked" a Tumblr weblog that I had named with the same username [to "disprove" me with some screenshots]. (Honestly, I had decided to change what that weblog was supposed to be about, I deleted those posts, and I put that weblog in[to] the process of deletion. It's still not deleted yet, though, because I still have some "likes" left to delete. So ... when I decided to mention that it wasn't that kind of a weblog, that's because I had decided to change it. P.S. The username actually had to do with books / with movies, not necessarily with those interests.)
- They made some negative assumptions about me (such as: that maybe I have a mental illness that makes me delusional and / or that makes me confused [and they are apparently a psychologist in real life ... from what I read on Reddit]). (I didn't want for there to be any assumptions made about me and / or about my interests, and I wanted to keep my privacy to myself. I already know that there are some people of faith that are interested CG/L [Duh!], and I wasn't trying to imply the opposite of that. I didn't call the website "anti-Religious" and / or "anti-Christian" (I just mentioned some stuff about my faith in the emails?), but some people of faith might not be so comfortable with reading some NSFW material. I wasn't just barely "converting to a new religion". I don't even have a religion. I actually have a faith. I didn't say whether or not I was actually into that stuff. #Privacy. And I wasn't trying to claim that I didn't join / didn't re-join that website and / or that I didn't post anything on that website [or whatever the heck they were trying to imply].)
- They threatened me with legal proceedings if I didn't stop "harrassing" them. (But I seriously only sent them a few emails, and they actually sent me a few emails, too.)
- "You are no longer welcome in our online community." (Or something like that.) I already did not plan to re-join that website (and especially now because of that experience with the owner). #SelfFlatteryMuch?
Anyway(s), I know that some of those things probably just ended up happening because of my own anxieties. Honestly, I just wanted to keep my privacy to myself (without people trying to make assumptions about whatever my interests may have been).
(An Edit / An Update: Some people consider CG/L, age-play, and age regression to be separate things, whereas some other people consider them to be the same things. Some people might not like to have their interests labeled as one thing when it might be another thing [to them / in their own opinions]. I'm not necessarily saying that you absolutely have to be all "politically correct" about it, though. [#TheFreedomOfSpeech. #TheFreedomOfExpression.] Some communities might feel like they are all separate things, some communities might feel like they are all the same things, some communitues might feel like CG/L and age-play are the same things and are separate from age regression, and some communities might feel like age-play and age regression are the same things and are separate from CG/L. And the same situation goes for AB/DL, because some people might feel like the AB aspect is separate from the DL aspect, and some people might feel like the AB aspect and the DL aspect are the same things. Some people might categorize AB as age-play and / or as age regression, and some people might categorize DL as "a fetish" and / or as "a kink". Some people might categorize the whole of AB/DL as any one of those things. Different people have different opinions on different things sometimes.)
("A Little Lifestyle VS A Little Age Play" by DaddysBabyG1rl [on NotSoGrowedUp.WordPress.com].)
(An Edit / An Update: KidHeart [an age regression community that is on Tumblr] doesn't allow interactions with the any of the communities that they deem as being "unsafe" for minors (even though there are non-sexual aspects of the communities ... but there can still be a little bit of an overlap with the sexual aspects of the communities): "A strictly nonsexual and nonkink regression community for age regressors, pet regressors, & system Littles |No kink/cgl/ddlg/little or nsfw/18+ or liltot/tinyroyal, or cglre interaction|". They also identify "age-play" as being a "kink" [even though it's technically just role-playing a type of age regression and / or a type of age progression, and it can also be a non-sexual thing for a lot of people, so it is not just a sexual thing for a lot of people].)
But ... anyway(s). Do I kind of wish that that whole situation had not even happened? Yes, basically ... because it caused a lot of stress for me. Maybe it did the same thing for them, too. *Sigh.*
Other than that, I just remember that the movie thing wasn't working at one point (for some people, I guess?) or something like that.
Well, that's basically it, I guess. Good-Bye, Everyone.
Here is a similar weblog post:
"Christiansplaining | Fifty Shades of Grey Is Not A "Representation" of the BDSM Community & Discrediting Common Myths".
For some legal reasons: This weblog post does not match the definition(s) of "slander" and / or the definition(s) of "libel". This weblog post is based on my own personal experience(s) on / with the website that was being discussed herein.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.